The year 2023 wasn't
particularly heated in terms of business travel merger and
acquisition activity. That's not to say there were no big deals—Blackstone's
acquisition of Cvent was among the biggest 2023 private
acquisitions of public companies in any industry—but 2023 for the most part
didn't have the big swings that the industry has seen in, say, 2021 or 2019.
That trend wasn't unique to business travel. S&P Global in recent
report tallied about 33,400 corporate transactions worldwide, of all
stripes and in all industries, a far cry from the 60,400 it counted for 2021.
The primary reasons behind the M&A slowdown, according
to BCG, cross industry lines and represent the "most prolonged
challenges since the 2008–2009 financial crisis:" rising interest rates,
geopolitical tensions and fears of an economic recession.
While geopolitical tensions, particularly the Russia-Ukraine and
Israel-Hamas conflicts, don't appear to be alleviating, the economic outlook,
at least in the United States, has shifted notably. With a steady stream of
positive economic indicators with limited inflation growth, capped with the
Jan. 25 announcement that the U.S. gross domestic product in the fourth quarter
of 2023 increased
at a 3.3 percent annualized rate, talk of inevitable recession has
died down considerably.
That could help to encourage investment in travel industry
suppliers and help back M&A activity. BCG global head of M&A Jens
Kengelbach in the report said his company was "relatively optimistic about
the outlook for 2024, as deal activity shows promising signs of recovery."
A report
this month in the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance also
pointed to "expectations of interest rate reductions and a 'soft landing'
in the U.S. economy" as reasons to project more M&A this year.
Still, as JetBlue and Spirit Airlines can attest, there are
barriers to M&A beyond the economy.
It's the same U.S. regulatory authorities that successfully
sued to prevent the merger of the two carriers—and sued to require
JetBlue dissolve its
Northeast Alliance with American Airlines—that many experts point to as a
roadblock to any increase in M&A activity this year.
"The U.S. political environment has also thrown recent
obstacles to dealmaking," S&P Global noted. "President Joe Biden
has made antitrust a priority in his administration." In fact, the Federal
Trade Commission in December released a new set of guidelines governing
potential mergers.
In addition to what it called the "aggressive enforcement
agenda" of the FTC and the Department of Justice, the Harvard Law School
report noted those regulators have become less amenable to deals involving
remedies to allay competition concerns, like the one American and US Airways reached
with DOJ in 2013 to allow that merger to proceed.
That aggression and skepticism of settlement could have effects
not only on potential industry M&A but also on a pair of would-be
transactions: Alaska Airlines' agreed-to
acquisition of Hawaiian Airlines, and Choice Hotels International's hostile
bid for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts.
First, the airlines: Alaska CEO Ben Minicucci drew a
sharp distinction between his company's acquisition and the
JetBlue-Spirit deal, noting that Alaska's and Hawaiian's route maps overlap on
only 12 routes. Still, he said, the carrier is talking with DOJ about the
proposed deal. Will the government go to the mat against the deal? The lack of
direct competition makes that seem less likely than it did for the
JetBlue-Spirit deal, where it was enough of a clear risk that JetBlue included
a nine-figure
break-up fee should regulators squash it.
The potential hotel deal is another story. Even if Choice succeeds
in its current bid to secure shareholder approval of its acquisition bid—hardly
a guarantee, given the thus-far steadfast opposition of Wyndham's board and
management—the economy-tier behemoth the combined companies would create seems
quite likely to draw antitrust regulators' attention, even though the franchise
model both hotel companies employ makes for complex ownership considerations.
Wyndham's management has pointed to regulatory
risk as a key reason for its opposition to Choice, though Choice
executives have said they already have met with the FTC "on a voluntary
basis to discuss the pro-competitive nature of the transaction."
In addition, the Biden administration's regulatory stance could
chill industry dealmakers from striking new transactions. "Investment
bankers have said the increased antitrust scrutiny has extended the closing
time for big-ticket transactions and deterred others from considering large
M&A deals," noted S&P Global. "Private equity firms face
regulatory pressure as they try to execute roll-up strategies by making add-on
acquisitions for portfolio companies in industries where policymakers are
raising concerns about anti-competitive practices."
Additionally, it's an election year in the United States.
Companies looking to deal might wait to see if the Biden administration is
replaced in a year by a potentially friendlier Republican—Trump,
seemingly—administration. Otherwise, 2024 offers no guarantee of a return to
industry dealmaking.