Even as corporate
booking tool providers improve their products, the siren call of
less-restrictive leisure booking tools pulls travelers out of their managed
programs. To counter that, Tripism factors in not just corporate preferred
suppliers and terms or just TripAdvisor-esque reviews but both. The booking
interface pairs preferred suppliers with coworkers' feedback on properties,
restaurants and the like. The result is an in-policy booking informed by a
consumer eye. Founder Adam Kerr spoke with BTN's Michael B. Baker.
What challenges does Tripism seek to resolve?
We did some early research, and about 85 to 90 percent of
business travelers use tools designed for the leisure traveler to piece
together that business trip. They will look at their preferred hotel list for a
given area and go to TripAdvisor or Booking.com to see what people say about
those hotels or use tools like Yelp to find restaurants that might be suitable
for them. That gives them a number of challenges. It's completely fragmented.
You're reading reviews, and those sites pride themselves on infinite content,
which is great if you're planning a vacation with your family and that's part
of the experience and part of the discovery. But if I have to meet Ericsson at
Bryant Park at 8 o'clock on Oct. 21, and I just want a hotel that's nearby and
in the program and convenient for me, I don't want infinite content. I want
specific information so I can make my decision. That's what Tripism does. We
take data from lots of different places and we also take the knowledge and the
reviews and tips from your coworkers, and we present that in a highly
sophisticated and relevant way to the traveler. Rather than seeing infinite
content, they can just see the information which we have for them to make a
fast, good travel-planning decision.
How do you determine those decisions?
We work with the customer, so we take information from them
like their office location, and put in those hotel suppliers. We can also look
at their expense data and see what are the most frequented restaurants in this
specific area. From doing that, you're benefiting from the corporate card usage
from people who live in that city, so the expertise locally and the kind of
research other travelers have done. We have partnerships. We work with people
like American Express corporate card and Dinova, the preferred restaurant
provider, so when a user logs in and needs information about a specific
destination, we can present it to the traveler so they can make the right
decision.
What role does traveler feedback play in those decisions?
Travel buyers do a fantastic job building relationships with
their travel suppliers [with] partial information. They have information about
number of nights stayed or number of dollars spent, but they don't have quality
of service or feedback from their travelers. We enable a very simple way for
travelers to quickly and easily give feedback that is helpful for their
coworkers to make their decision. If someone I know has recommended a hotel
near Bryant Park, that's an easy decision for me because I trust them. We also
do analysis on those reviews and can provide them back to the travel managers,
which they can use to provide constructive feedback to their suppliers and
drive continual improvement to the performance of their travel suppliers.
That feedback is visible only to the buyer, not the
supplier, correct?
Correct, though we have what we call a supplier portal and
some companies would like us to engage with their suppliers and give them
access to the portal. That enables [suppliers] to provide very rich content,
which is specific for business travelers, and they can also create negotiated
benefits or specific unique promotions just for travelers from that company. If
I'm a traveler from Company X, when I log in, the content I see is the content
only meant for users of that company. As part of that, they are happy for us to
provide anonymized reviews back to the travel supplier. I can see it's a
traveler from Company X. I can't see who it is, but I can see what they said.
[Consider a hotel that invests] a tremendous amount of money in a property and
[tries] to provide the very best service to travelers from this company. [They've]
negotiated fantastic benefits for travelers from that company, but when
travelers from that company look at the booking tool, it's so unsophisticated
because the GDSs are so restrictive in the amount of information that can pass
through. They are perceived to be exactly the same as the property across the
road, which hasn't been refurbished in 20 years and provides very little in
additional value to travelers. With our platform, they can present themselves
in a fantastic way and can present those negotiated benefits clearly to the
travelers. It's great for the traveler because I get more benefits and
visibility of unique promotions.
How would Tripism improve compliance versus a standard
corporate booking tool?
Eighty-five percent of travelers are completely unaware of
negotiated benefits from preferred suppliers because they can't see it
anywhere. This platform enables them to do more and provide more benefits to
the traveler. Travel suppliers frequently want to enable special promotions for
travelers from different companies, but they have no means of being able to do
it. They can either put a PDF on the Internet, where it's not read or [it's]
forgotten about, or they can email 20,000 travelers, of which it might only be
relevant for 100. With Tripism, say they have a trip for August in Chicago. We
can show them where the office is located, which of the preferred hotels is
nearby, what travelers and coworkers say about the hotel, the unique benefits
negotiated and any promotions applicable for that location at the time they are
traveling. It's just a much better way of presenting information to the
travelers.
How many buyers are you working with so far?
With the platform, we work with 20 or so [small
and midsize enterprises] in Europe, but now our focus is around the larger
corporate. We've announced that we will work with Microsoft on a global basis.
In the next quarter, we'll be going live with another two large corporations,
and we'll leverage that to bring on more through the early part of next year.